Monday
22 March 2010

News Junkie

  

The best architectural stories elsewhere on the web

Architects unhappy at US stimulus bill

February 11th, 2009

 

Across the pond, architects are weighing in against the Senate’s version of the stimulus bill as it no longer contains funds earmarked for school construction.

 

http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/theskyline/2009/02/whos-mad-about-the-senates-version-of-the-stimulus-bill-architects-.html

 

-         Chicago Tribune

 

http://archrecord.construction.com/news/daily/archives/090210stimuluspasses.asp

 

- Architecture Review

 

The American Institute of Architects is one of those leading the charge for some long term infrastructure funds to be reinstated.

 

The original Senate bill had $19.5 billion directed toward school construction, of which $16 billion was for K-12 facilities and $3.5 billion for colleges and universities. Funds for greening federal buildings were also reduced, from $6 billion to $4.5 billion.

 

Here is a copy of the letter that the AIA sent yesterday to congressional representatives:

 

February 10, 2009

 

The Honorable Harry Reid                              The Honorable Mitch McConnell

Majority Leader                                                Republican Leader

U.S. Senate                                                     U.S. Senate

528 Hart Senate Office Building                      361-A Russell Senate Office Building

Washington, D.C. 20510                                 Washington, D.C. 20510

 

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi                            The Honorable John Boehner

Speaker                                                             Republican Leader

U.S. House of Representatives                        U.S. House of Representatives

235 Cannon House Office Building                  110 Longworth House Office Building

Washington, D.C. 20515                                  Washington, D.C. 20515

 

 

Dear Congressional Leaders:

 

We, the undersigned organizations, write in strong support of investments in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for school modernization. In particular, we support the House-passed appropriation of $14 billion in funds for school modernization, renovation, and repair, with specific provisions related to green, high-performing schools. 

The design, construction, and renovation of green, high-performing schools not only improve the learning environment for students; it creates jobs. A study conducted by the Center for Regional Analysis at George Mason University reports that each $1 million in construction spending supports 28.5 full-time jobs. This means that the $14 billion provided in the House bill for school modernization would create nearly 400,000 private sector jobs in the design and construction industries, which have been particularly hard-hit by the economic crisis. There are thousands of shovel-ready school projects across the country that will generate jobs immediately.

America’s school buildings are in desperate need of repair. Too many of America’s children attend school in overcrowded buildings with leaky roofs, faulty electrical systems, and outdated technology, all of which compromise their ability to achieve, succeed, and develop the  educational skills necessary for the workforce of the 21st century. A study released in December 2008 by the American Federation of Teachers estimates school infrastructure need at more than $254 billion nationally. As the economic crisis worsens, local education agencies are further delaying and canceling major capital projects to repair and modernize school buildings, meaning that the amount of money needed to repair schools grows every day.

 

According to the State Education Data Center (SEDC) of the Council of Chief State School Officers, average spending by school districts on operations and maintenance is $900 per student, or $45 billion nationwide per year. This means it costs school districts $45 billion just to maintain school buildings’ current condition. Construction adds an additional $45 billion per year. With the increased costs of energy and construction materials and tight budgets, school districts are currently laying off maintenance personnel, canceling or deferring modernization work, and delaying purchases of new equipment. 

Green, high-performing schools promote healthy, high-achieving students who will become future advocates for green living, as this generation learns the importance of building for a sustainable future. School districts see direct benefits accrue at a level of around four times the upfront cost of green improvements due to energy savings and other cost control mechanisms. 

In fact, according to a 2006 study by Capital E, the energy and water savings from green schools would save each school, on average, $100,000 annually, enough money to hire a full-time teacher at a time when state and local funding for education is in scarce supply. Improved energy and water efficiency from the installation of green features also promise long-term savings that can replenish the funds of school districts and put money back into taxpayers’ pockets.  

Intrinsically, schools are an investment in our collective future, ensuring that tomorrow’s leaders will be prepared to meet the significant challenges our nation will face. As we work to steer our economy out of decline and toward a vibrant future, it is critical that we grasp this opportunity to ensure high-quality learning environments for our children.

For these reasons, we call on Congress to include $14 billion for green, high-performing schools in the final version of H.R. 1.

 

Sincerely,

 

American Institute of Architects

U.S. Green Building Council

21st Century School Fund

Addison

AEC Science & Technology

AllForTek, Inc.

American Architectural Foundation

American Association of Classified School Employees

American Congress on Surveying and Mapping

American Council of Engineering Companies

American Federation of Teachers

American Lighting Association

American Society of Civil Engineers

American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers

American Society of Landscape Architects

Architecture 2030

ASBO International

Asphalt Roofing Manufactures Association

Association of Union Constructors

Baybutt Construction Corp.

Bowie-Gridley Architects

BRW Architects

Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association

Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO

Campaign for Quality Construction

College Planning & Management

Composite Lumber Manufacturers Association

Council for Educational Facility Planners International

Dykeman Architecture

E&I Cooperative Service, Inc.

Earth Day Network

Environment America

Federation of American Scientists

Finishing Contractors Association

Friends of the Earth

Green Building Initiative

Green for All

Healthy Schools Campaign

Innovation Partnership

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

International Council of Employers of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers

Johnson Controls, Inc.

Lord & Son Construction, Inc.

Masonry Veneer Manufacturers Association

Mechanical Contractors Association of America

National Association for State Community Services Programs

National Association of Energy Service Companies

National Association of State Energy Officials

National Education Association

National Institute of Building Sciences

National PTA

National School Plant Management Association

National Wildlife Federation

Paragon Furniture

PDT Architects (Maine)

Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association

Plumbing Manufacturers Institute

Polyisocyanurate Insulation Manufacturers Association

Roof Coatings Manufacturers Association

Schneider Electric

School Planning & Management

Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors’ National Association

Sheet Metal Workers International Association

Sierra Club

The Stella Group, Ltd.

U.S. Conference of Mayors

Window and Door Manufacturers Association

 

US architects weigh in on Obama’s stimulus plan

January 29th, 2009

The AIA (America’s equivalent of RIBA) have weighed in on the new US economic stimulus plan.

If the plan passes, then government buildings, and energy efficient design is likely to be a major beneficiary. Good news right? But as always there is a catch: Which architecture firms will actually get the contracts? Will there be work for a broad spread of the industry or just for a few key players?

This Business Week article looks at some of the key procurement details

http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/jan2009/id20090128_490685.htm?chan=innovation_architecture_top+stories

Awards
Events/Conferences
Sister sites